Skip Navigation



Carcinogenesis Advance Access published online on November 3, 2009

Carcinogenesis, doi:10.1093/carcin/bgp274
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reddel, R. R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reddel, R. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Senescence: an antiviral defense that is tumor suppressive?

Roger R. Reddel

Cancer Research Unit, Children's Medical Research Institute, 214 Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, New South Wales 2145, and Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006 Australia

Correspondence: Roger Reddel, Children's Medical Research Institute, 214 Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia, email: rreddel{at}cmri.usyd.edu.au

Normal mammalian somatic cells proliferate a finite number of times in vitro before permanently withdrawing from the cell cycle into a cellular state referred to as senescence. Senescence may be triggered by excessive mitogenic stimulation or by various forms of cellular damage including excessive telomere shortening. Over the past decade, there has been continuing accumulation of evidence that senescence occurs in vivo, that it is relevant to aging, and that it has a tumor suppressor function. However, it has also become clear that the phenotype of senescence also has a number of puzzling features, including the secretion of pro-inflammatory factors that may foster tumorigenesis and also the senescence of neighboring cells. On the basis of these antagonistic pro- and anti-tumorigenic effects, and of the observation that many viruses have developed proteins that prevent senescence of the cells they infect, it is argued that the primary function of senescence may have been as an antiviral defense mechanism. Recent progress in understanding how tumor cells evade senescence is also reviewed here.

Key Words: Senescence • antiviral • Telomerase

Received October 30, 2009; revised October 30, 2009; accepted October 30, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.