Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boucher, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hines, R. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boucher, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hines, R. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 Oxford University Press

research-article

In vitro binding and functional studies comparing the human CYPIAI negative regulatory element with the orthologous sequences from rodent genes

Paul D. Boucher and Ronald N. Hines 1

Department of Pharmacology, Wayne State University School of Medicine Detroit, MI 48201–1998, USA

1To whom reprint request should be sent

In previous studies, we identified a 21 bp palindrome (-794 to -774) located within the negative regulatory element of the human CYP1A1 gene consisting of an 8 bp inverted repeat and 5 bp spacer. This element specifically binds protein(s) present in HepG2 nuclear extract preparations and is capable of down-regulating heterologous promoters and enhancers in transient expression assays. Conserved guanine/cytosine-rich regions which flank the palindrome also were implicated in this activity. In the present study, we examined similar regions from the rat (-881 to -746) and mouse (-822 to -683) CYP1A1 genes for their ability to bind nuclear protein and down-regulate heterologous promoters and enhancers. These rodent DNA fragments contain the conserved guanine/cytosine-rich sequences, as well as half-sites similar to those found in the human CYP1A1 palindrome. However, each half-site is separated by ~40 bp. DNase I footprint analyses revealed the presence of rat and mouse nuclear proteins which gave a similar protection pattern as that observed with nuclear proteins from the human cell line, HepG2. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays with the human negative regulatory element demonstrated the formation of specific DNA-protein complexes with rat and mouse nuclear protein(s). Interestingly, two specific DNA-protein complexes were observed with rodent extracts as compared to the single specific complex seen with human extract. Specific binding was not observed with either the orthologous rat or mouse fragments using human or rodent extracts. In transient expression assays, the rat and mouse fragments were unable to down-regulate enhancer/promoter activity. This absence of negative regulatory activity occurred whether transfections were performed in human, rat or mouse hepatoma cell lines. The human negative regulatory element, which was previously shown to down-regulate heterologous enhancers/promoters ~70% in human cells, did not exhibit this activity in rodent cell lines. UV cross-linking and southwestern blot analyses indicated a high degree of similarity between human and rodent NRE binding proteins, although some differences also were apparent. The possible implications of these findings with regards to species differences in the regulation of CYPIAI expression are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Takahashi, K. Nakayama, S. Itoh, Y. Fujii-Kuriyama, and T. Kamataki
Inhibition of the Transcription of CYP1A1 Gene by the Upstream Stimulatory Factor 1 in Rabbits. COMPETITIVE BINDING OF USF1 WITH AhR·Arnt COMPLEX
J. Biol. Chem., November 28, 1997; 272(48): 30025 - 30031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. S. Malone, S. A. Omori, and R. Wall
Silencer elements controlling the B29 (Igbeta ) promoter are neither promoter- nor cell-type-specific
PNAS, November 11, 1997; 94(23): 12314 - 12319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.