Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jin, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Carothers, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jin, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Carothers, A. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 Oxford University Press

research-article

Non-random deletions at the dihydrofolate reductase locus of Chinese hamster ovary cells induced by {alpha}-particles simulating radon

Yi Jin, Ting-An Yie and Adelaide M. Carothers 1 2

Insutute of Cancer Research
1School of Public Health/Division of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University 701 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA

2To whom correspondence should be addressed

This study presents the physical characterization of mutants induced in mammalian cells by high linear energy transfer {alpha}-Particle radiation that simulates exposure to radon daughters. {alpha}-Particles from accelerated 4He at 150 keV/µm were used to induce 20 Chinese hamster ovary mutants that are deficient in dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) activity. Parental cells were the hemizygous UA21 line. Cell survival decreased exponentially in response to radiation dose from 0.25 to 1.75 Gy. Mutants were obtained at 1.0 (17/20) and 1.25 Gy (3/20); treatments at 1.50 Gy failed to yield mutants. The induced frequency of mutation was 2.3x10–6 at the 1.0 Gy dose, ~18-fold greater than the spontaneous mutation rate at this locus. DNA of the 20 confirmed null mutants were examined for alterations in the 25 kb DHFR gene by Southern blotting using a mixed probe that scans a continuous 34 kb of sequence. Deletions were the most prevalent induced change (18/20). Of the two point mutants, DNA sequencing showed that one carries a T:A->G:C base substitution that changed Vall35 to Gly in exon 5; carcinogen-induced reversion to a DHFR+ phenotype at a frequency of 3x10–6 confirmed that the other also carried a single base change. The distribution of deletion break sites in the DHFR locus was non-random. In half of the mutants deletion break sites were clustered within a single 9.4 kb DHFR intron. Fine mapping within the gene of 14 mutants by Southern blotting localized 10 distinct break sites to small restriction fragments (<2 kb). Results of this mapping indicated that three unequivocally independent mutants apparently arose by the same deletion and that others shared single break sites. Deletion sizes in these mutants were determined by Southern analysis using six cosmids and two plasmid probes that together span ~500 kb of sequence in the region of the DHFR locus. Probing blots with the cosmids defined a maximal deletion size in 15/17 mutants and confirmed that deletions extended <150 kb in 11, a qualitatively different result from that previously obtained after a similar analysis of {gamma}-ray-induced DHFR- mutants. Since deletions were non-randomly distributed, typically less than replicon size and spared regions containing matrix attachment sites, the results suggest a model whereby {alpha}-particles induce double-strand breaks in accessible chromatin loops.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
E. T. Wong, J. L Kolman, Y.-C. Li, L. D Mesner, W. Hillen, C. Berens, and G. M Wahl
Reproducible doxycycline-inducible transgene expression at specific loci generated by Cre-recombinase mediated cassette exchange
Nucleic Acids Res., October 4, 2005; 33(17): e147 - e147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
L. D. Mesner and J. L. Hamlin
Specific signals at the 3' end of the DHFR gene define one boundary of the downstream origin of replication
Genes & Dev., May 1, 2005; 19(9): 1053 - 1066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
A. L. Altman and E. Fanning
Defined Sequence Modules and an Architectural Element Cooperate To Promote Initiation at an Ectopic Mammalian Chromosomal Replication Origin
Mol. Cell. Biol., May 15, 2004; 24(10): 4138 - 4150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
S. Saha, Y. Shan, L. D. Mesner, and J. L. Hamlin
The promoter of the Chinese hamster ovary dihydrofolate reductase gene regulates the activity of the local origin and helps define its boundaries
Genes & Dev., February 15, 2004; 18(4): 397 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. D. Mesner, J. L. Hamlin, and P. A. Dijkwel
The matrix attachment region in the Chinese hamster dihydrofolate reductase origin of replication may be required for local chromatid separation
PNAS, March 18, 2003; 100(6): 3281 - 3286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
L. D. Mesner, X. Li, P. A. Dijkwel, and J. L. Hamlin
The Dihydrofolate Reductase Origin of Replication Does Not Contain Any Nonredundant Genetic Elements Required for Origin Activity
Mol. Cell. Biol., February 1, 2003; 23(3): 804 - 814.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
A. L. Altman and E. Fanning
The Chinese Hamster Dihydrofolate Reductase Replication Origin Beta Is Active at Multiple Ectopic Chromosomal Locations and Requires Specific DNA Sequence Elements for Activity
Mol. Cell. Biol., February 15, 2001; 21(4): 1098 - 1110.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.