Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sestili, P.
Right arrow Articles by Cantoni, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sestili, P.
Right arrow Articles by Cantoni, O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press

other

SHORT COMMUNICATION: AG8 cells, which are highly resistant to hydrogen peroxide, display collateral sensitivity to the combination of hydrogen peroxide and L-histidine

Piero Sestili, Andrea Guidarelli, Flaminio Cattabeni, David Murray 1 and Orazio Cantoni 2

Istituto di Farmacologia e Farmacognosia and Centro di Farmacologia Oncologica Sperimentale, Università di Urbino Via S.Chiara, 27, 61029 Urbino, Italy
1Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Cross Cancer Institute 11560 University Ave., Edmonton, AB 76G 1Z2, Canada

2To whom correspondence should be addressed

The results obtained in the present study indicate that AG8 cells, which are highly resistant to H2O2, are not cross-resistant to the combination of H2O2/-histidine. In fact, once the influence of elevated catalase on the AG8 phenotype has been circumvented (by treatment of AG8 cells with aminotriazole), AG8 cells display essentially no crossresistance to the H2O2/L-histidine cocktail while retaining considerable resistance to H2O2 alone (when compared to wild-type AA8 cells). Although H2O2 alone does not produce DNA double strand breaks (DSBs), this type of lesion was readily detected upon exposure of sensitive or resistant cells to the oxidant in the presence of the amino acid. Interestingly, similar levels of DNA DSBs were detected in AA8 and catalase-depleted AG8 cells. An excellent correlation was found when the cytotoxicity and thelevel of DNA DSBs obtained in sensitive and resistant cells (with normal or reduced catalase levels) challenged with the cocktail H2O2/L-histidine were compared. This would suggest that DSBs produced on a per cell basis always result in an equal level of toxicity, regardless of the cell type (resistant versus sensitive cell line), the lethality of each of these cell lines being dependent on the number of induced DSBs. In conclusion, the results presented here provide further evidence in support of the hypothesis that cell killing elicited by the combination of H2O2/L-histidine involves a mechanism distinct from that following treatment with H2O2 alone. The fact that H2O2-resistant AG8 cells, which are not cross-resistant to agents promoting cell death via DNA DSB-induction, display collateral sensitivity to the cocktail H2O2/L-histidine, strongly suggests that cell killing triggered by this treatment is mediated by DNA double strand breakage.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.