Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kolaja, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Klaunig, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kolaja, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Klaunig, J. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press

research-article

Inhibition of tumor promotion and hepatocellular growth by dietary restriction in mice

Kyle L. Kolaja, Kyle A. Bunting and James E. Klaunig 1

Division of Toxicology, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine 1001 Walnut Street MRF 003, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA

1To whom correspondence should be addressed

The effects of dietary restriction on the growth of hepatic focal lesions in phenobarbital (PB) promoted mice were examined. Dietary restriction which can inhibit many age-related diseases in rodents including hepatic cancer also decreases cell proliferation and increases apoptosis in the liver. In contrast, PB, a non-genotoxic rodent hepatocarcinogen, enhances the growth of hepatic focal lesions in mice and rats by increasing cell proliferation and inhibiting apoptosis. The present study examined the impact of dietary restriction on PB-induced hepatic tumor promotion. Focal lesions were produced by diethylnitrosamine (DEN) treatment (35 mg DEN/kg body weight injections, twice per week for 8 weeks). After lesions were produced, mice were placed into one of the following four groups: NIH-07 control diet/no PB (group 1); NIH-07 diet/500 mg PB per liter of drinking water (group 2); dietary restricted NIH-07 diet/no PB (group 3); and dietary restricted NIH-7 diet/500 mg PB per liter of drinking water (group 4). In this study, PB (500 mg/1) treatment to ad libitum-fed mice (group 2) enhanced focal lesion volume, number, and labeling index compared with group 1. In addition, PB treatment (group 2) inhibited apoptosis in normal and focal hepatocytes compared with untreated control mice (group 1). In contrast, in dietary restricted mice treated with PB (group 4) a significantly lower focal lesion volume, number and labeling index were seen compared with the ad libitumfed/PB treatment group (group 2). PB treatment in dietary restricted mice (group 4) did not inhibit focal apoptosis, in fact, the incidence of focal apoptosis was increased in these mice compared with ad libitum and PB-treated mice (group 2). In dietary restricted mice treated with PB (group 4), the ability of PB to promote the growth of preneoplastic focal lesions was inhibited. These results show that dietary restriction can ablate the tumor promotional effects of PB in hepatic focal lesions and suggest that inhibition of focal lesion DNA synthesis and enhancement of apoptosis may be a mechanism for this effect.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
J. Lu, L. Xie, J. Sylvester, J. Wang, J. Bai, R. Baybutt, and W. Wang
Different Gene Expression of Skin Tissues Between Mice with Weight Controlled by Either Calorie Restriction or Physical Exercise
Experimental Biology and Medicine, April 1, 2007; 232(4): 473 - 480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
W. Bursch, U. Wastl, K. Hufnagl, and R. Schulte-Hermann
No Increase of Apoptosis in Regressing Mouse Liver after Withdrawal of Growth Stimuli or Food Restriction
Toxicol. Sci., May 1, 2005; 85(1): 507 - 514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
H. J. Thompson, Z. Zhu, and W. Jiang
Identification of the Apoptosis Activation Cascade Induced in Mammary Carcinomas by Energy Restriction
Cancer Res., February 15, 2004; 64(4): 1541 - 1545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
W. Jiang, Z. Zhu, N. Bhatia, R. Agarwal, and H. J. Thompson
Mechanisms of Energy Restriction: Effects of Corticosterone on Cell Growth, Cell Cycle Machinery, and Apoptosis
Cancer Res., September 15, 2002; 62(18): 5280 - 5287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
A. G. Cuenca, W. D. Cress, R. A. Good, Y. Marikar, and R. W. Engelman
Calorie Restriction Influences Cell Cycle Protein Expression and DNA Synthesis during Liver Regeneration
Experimental Biology and Medicine, December 1, 2001; 226(11): 1061 - 1067.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
L. M. Brennan, E. M. Boncavage-Hennessey, M. J. Wolfe, M. W. Toussaint, W. E. Dennis, A. B. Rosencrance, and H. S. Gardner JR
An In Vivo Method for Using 5-Bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) as a Marker of Chemically-Induced Hepatocellular Proliferation in the Japanese Medaka (Oryzias latipes)
Toxicol Pathol, April 1, 2001; 29(3): 387 - 397.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
J E Klaunig, L M Kamendulis, and Y. Xu
Epigenetic mechanisms of chemical carcinogenesis
Human and Experimental Toxicology, October 1, 2000; 19(10): 543 - 555.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
R. I. Salganik, C. D. Albright, J. Rodgers, J. Kim, S. H. Zeisel, M. S. Sivashinskiy, and T. A. Van Dyke
Dietary antioxidant depletion: enhancement of tumor apoptosis and inhibition of brain tumor growth in transgenic mice
Carcinogenesis, May 1, 2000; 21(5): 909 - 914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. Matsuzaki, R. Yamaji, K. Kiyomiya, M. Kurebe, H. Inui, and Y. Nakano
Implanted Tumor Growth Is Suppressed and Survival Is Prolonged in Sixty Percent of Food-Restricted Mice
J. Nutr., January 1, 2000; 130(1): 111 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.