Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, G. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol. 20, No. 10, 1919-1926, October 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press


Molecular Epidemiology and Cancer Prevention

Inhibition of dibenzo[a,l]pyrene-induced multi-organ carcinogenesis by dietary chlorophyllin in rainbow trout

Ashok P. Reddy, Ulrich Harttig, Marita C. Barth, William M. Baird, Michael Schimerlik1, Jerry D. Hendricks and George S. Bailey2

Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology and
1 Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Oregon State University, Corvallis,OR 97331, USA

Cancer chemoprevention by dietary chlorophyllin (CHL) was investigated in a rainbow trout multi-organ tumor model. In study 1, duplicate groups of 130 juvenile trout were treated for 2 weeks with control diet, 500 p.p.m. dibenzo[a,l]pyrene (DB[a,l]P) or 500 p.p.m. DB[a,l]P + 2052 p.p.m. CHL, then returned to control diet. DB[a,l]P alone proved somewhat toxic but induced high tumor incidences in liver (61%), stomach (91%) and swimbladder (53%) 11 months after initiation. CHL co-feeding abrogated DB[a,l]P acute toxicity and reduced tumor incidences to 18% in liver, 34% in stomach and 3% in swimbladder (P <= 0.01). A second tumor and DNA adduct study using a non-toxic initiation protocol (200 p.p.m. DB[a,l]P ± 4000 p.p.m. CHL for 4 weeks) confirmed these results. Potential CHL inhibitory mechanisms were investigated. Dietary CHL inhibited hepatic DB[a,l]P–DNA adducts in the two tumor studies by 89 and 76%, respectively. CHL was shown to complex strongly with DB[a,l]P (Kd1,2 = 1.59 ± 0.01 µM, stoichiometry 2CHL:DB[a,l]P) and strongly inhibited DB[a,l]P mutagenesis in the Salmonella assay. Significant inhibition occurred at CHL concentrations substantially less than stoichiometric with DB[a,l]P and thus not reflecting simple DB[a,l]P sequestration via complexation. These initial findings suggest that CHL chemoprevention reflects complexation that might limit DB[a,l]P uptake in vivo, antimutagenic mechanisms such as catalytic degradation of the proximate electrophile in target cells, or both. These results demonstrate that dietary CHL is a reproducibly effective chemopreventive agent for DB[a,l]P multi-organ tumorigenesis in trout and suggest that reduced DB[a,l]P–DNA adducts may be predictive biomarkers of CHL reduction of DB[a,l]P-initiated hepatic tumors.

Abbreviations: AFB1, aflatoxin B1; BNF, ß-naphthoflavone; CHL, chlorophyllin; DB[a,l]P, dibenzo[a,l]pyrene; DMBA, 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene; DMSO, dimethylsulfoxide; DTE, dithioerythritol; OTD, Oregon test diet; PhIP, 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo-[4,5-b]pyridine; THF, tetrahydrofuran.

2 To whom correspondence should be addressed Email: george.bailey{at}orst.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
D. J. Castro, C. V. Lohr, K. A. Fischer, K. M. Waters, B.-J. M. Webb-Robertson, R. H. Dashwood, G. S. Bailey, and D. E. Williams
Identifying efficacious approaches to chemoprevention with chlorophyllin, purified chlorophylls and freeze-dried spinach in a mouse model of transplacental carcinogenesis
Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2009; 30(2): 315 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
M. T. Simonich, P. A. Egner, B. D. Roebuck, G. A. Orner, C. Jubert, C. Pereira, J. D. Groopman, T. W. Kensler, R. H. Dashwood, D. E. Williams, et al.
Natural chlorophyll inhibits aflatoxin B1-induced multi-organ carcinogenesis in the rat
Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2007; 28(6): 1294 - 1302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
M. Margaret Pratt, A. P. Reddy, J. D. Hendricks, C. Pereira, T. W. Kensler, and G. S. Bailey
The importance of carcinogen dose in chemoprevention studies: quantitative interrelationships between, dibenzo[a,l]pyrene dose, chlorophyllin dose, target organ DNA adduct biomarkers and final tumor outcome
Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2007; 28(3): 611 - 624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Z. Yu, C. V. Loehr, K. A. Fischer, M. A. Louderback, S. K. Krueger, R. H. Dashwood, N. I. Kerkvliet, C. B. Pereira, J. E. Jennings-Gee, S. T. Dance, et al.
In utero Exposure of Mice to Dibenzo[a,l]Pyrene Produces Lymphoma in the Offspring: Role of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor
Cancer Res., January 15, 2006; 66(2): 755 - 762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
G. D. Diaz, Q. Li, and R. H. Dashwood
Caspase-8 and Apoptosis-inducing Factor Mediate a Cytochrome c-independent Pathway of Apoptosis in Human Colon Cancer Cells Induced by the Dietary Phytochemical Chlorophyllin
Cancer Res., March 15, 2003; 63(6): 1254 - 1261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
D. E. Williams, G. S. Bailey, A. Reddy, J. D. Hendricks, A. Oganesian, G. A. Orner, C. B. Pereira, and J. A. Swenberg
The Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Tumor Model: Recent Applications in Low-Dose Exposures to Tumor Initiators and Promoters
Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2003; 31(1_suppl): 58 - 61.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.