Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pavanello, S.
Right arrow Articles by Clonfero, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pavanello, S.
Right arrow Articles by Clonfero, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol. 20, No. 3, 431-435, March 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press

HPLC/fluorescence determination of anti-BPDE–DNA adducts in mononuclear white blood cells from PAH-exposed humans

Sofia Pavanello1,5, Donata Favretto2, Francesco Brugnone3, Giuseppe Mastrangelo1, Giorgio Dal Pra4 and Erminio Clonfero1

1 Institute of Occupational Health, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova,
2 CNR, Area di Ricerca, Corso Stati Uniti 4, Padova,
3 Institute of Occupational Health, University of Verona, Verona and
4 Occupational Health Service, Provincia di Bolzano, Boleano, Italy

The aim of this study was to compare (±)-r-7,t-8-dihydroxy-t-9,10-oxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene (anti-BPDE)–DNA adduct levels in groups of humans subjected to various levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) (benzo[a]pyrene) exposure. An HPLC/fluorescence method was applied to detect specifically anti-BPDE–DNA adducts in mononuclear white blood cells [lymphocyte plus monocyte fraction (LMF)] from humans exposed to PAHs. A total of 130 subjects comprised the sample population: 26 psoriatic patients (3 days after clinical coal tar treatment of the skin), 15 coke oven workers, 19 chimney sweeps, 36 aluminium anode plant workers and 34 non-occupationally PAH-exposed subjects (controls). PAH exposure was assessed in each group by means of the urinary excretion of 1-pyrenol (mean group levels: 1.2, 0.7, 0.3, 65.0 and 0.1 µmol/mol creatinine in coke oven workers, chimney sweeps, aluminium plant anode workers, psoriatic patients and non-occupationally PAH-exposed subjects, respectively). HPLC/fluorescence analysis of BPDE–DNA adducts showed that the percentage of subjects with adduct levels exceeding the 95 percentile control subject value (8.9 adducts/108 nucleotides) was significantly high in coke oven workers (46.7%) and chimney sweeps (21.0%) ({chi}2 test, P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively) but not in aluminium plant workers (11.1%) and psoriatic patients (0%). The increase in BPDE–DNA adduct levels in LMF (Ln values) was significantly related to chronic inhalatory and high PAH exposure (linear multiple regression analysis, F = 6.37, P < 0.01; t = 4.2, P < 0.001). Skin acute (or short-term) and high PAH exposure, charcoal-grilled meat consumption and smoking habit did not seem to influence BPDE–DNA adduct formation in LMF.

Abbreviations: anti-BPDE, (±)-r-7,t-8-dihydroxy-t-9,10-oxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene; B[a]P, benzo[a]pyrene; B[a]P-tetrol I-1, r-7,c-10,t-8,t-9-tetrahydroxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydro-benzo[a]pyrene; CT, coal tar; CYP, cytochrome P450; GST, glutathione S-transferase; LMF, lymphocyte plus monocyte fraction; PAH, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon; TLC, thin-layer chromatography; WBC, white blood cell.

5 To whom correspondence should be addressed Email: clonfero{at}uxl.unipd.it


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Journal of ToxicologyHome page
Final Safety Assessment of Coal Tar as Used in Cosmetics
International Journal of Toxicology, March 1, 2008; 27(2_suppl): 1 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
E. Gyorffy, L. Anna, K. Kovacs, P. Rudnai, and B. Schoket
Correlation between biomarkers of human exposure to genotoxins with focus on carcinogen-DNA adducts
Mutagenesis, January 1, 2008; 23(1): 1 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
S.-J. An, J.-K. Chen, H.-j. Chen, W. Chang, Y.-G. Jiang, Q.-Y. Wei, and X.-M. Chen
Characterization of 67 kD Laminin Receptor, a Protein Whose Gene Is Overexpressed on Treatment of Cells with Anti-Benzo[a]pyrene-7,8-Diol-9,10-Epoxide
Toxicol. Sci., April 1, 2006; 90(2): 326 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
M. Culea, O. Cozar, and E. Culea
PAHs in Cigarette Smoke by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
Indoor and Built Environment, June 1, 2005; 14(3-4): 283 - 292.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
S. Pavanello, A. Pulliero, E. Siwinska, D. Mielzynska, and E. Clonfero
Reduced nucleotide excision repair and GSTM1-null genotypes influence anti-B[a]PDE-DNA adduct levels in mononuclear white blood cells of highly PAH-exposed coke oven workers
Carcinogenesis, January 1, 2005; 26(1): 169 - 175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
D. H. Phillips
Smoking-related DNA and protein adducts in human tissues
Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2002; 23(12): 1979 - 2004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
T. Schwerdtle, A. Seidel, and A. Hartwig
Effect of soluble and particulate nickel compounds on the formation and repair of stable benzo[a]pyrene DNA adducts in human lung cells
Carcinogenesis, January 1, 2002; 23(1): 47 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.