Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by Haseman, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by Haseman, J. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol. 20, No. 8, 1615-1620, August 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press


Carcinogenesis

Effect of 13 week magnetic field exposures on DMBA-initiated mammary gland carcinomas in female Sprague–Dawley rats

Larry E. Anderson, Gary A. Boorman1,3, James E. Morris, Lyle B. Sasser, Peter C. Mann2, Sondra L. Grumbein, James R. Hailey1, Alan McNally2, Robert C. Sills1 and Joseph K. Haseman1

Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories, PO Box 999, Richland, WA 99352,
1 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, PO Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 and
2 Experimental Pathology Laboratory Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA

Several studies suggest that exposure to 50 Hz magnetic fields may promote chemically induced breast cancer in rats. Groups of 100 female Sprague–Dawley rats were initiated with four weekly 5 mg gavage doses of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA) starting at 50 days of age. After the first weekly DMBA administration, exposure to ambient fields (sham exposed), 50 Hz magnetic fields at either 1 or 5 G field intensity or 60 Hz fields at 1 G for 18.5 h/day, 7 days/week was initiated. Exposure continued for 13 weeks. A vehicle control group without DMBA was included. In a second study, using lower doses of DMBA, groups of 100 female Sprague–Dawley rats were initiated with four weekly doses of 2 mg of DMBA starting at 50 days of age followed, after the first weekly DMBA administration, by exposure to ambient fields (sham exposed) or 50 Hz magnetic fields at either 1 or 5 G field intensity for 18.5 h/day, 7 days/week for 13 weeks. Rats were weighed and palpated weekly for the presence of tumors. There was no effect of magnetic field exposure on body weight gains or on the time of appearance of mammary tumors in either study. At the end of 13 weeks, the animals were killed and the mammary tumors counted and measured. Mammary gland masses found grossly were examined histologically. In the first 13 week study, the mammary gland carcinoma incidences were 92, 86, 96 and 96% for the DMBA controls, 1 G, 50 Hz, 5 G, 50 Hz and 1 G, 60 Hz groups, respectively. The total numbers of carcinomas were 691, 528 (P < 0.05, decrease), 561 and 692 for the DMBA controls, 1 G, 50 Hz, 5 G, 50 Hz and 1 G, 60 Hz groups, respectively. In study 2, the mammary gland carcinoma incidences were 43, 48 and 38% for the DMBA controls, 1 G, 50 Hz and 5 G, 50 Hz groups, respectively. The total numbers of carcinomas were 102, 90 and 79 for the DMBA controls, 1 G, 50 Hz and 5 G, 50 Hz groups, respectively. There was no effect of magnetic field exposure on tumor size either by in-life palpation or by measurement at necropsy in either study. There was no evidence that 50 or 60 Hz magnetic fields promoted breast cancer in these studies in female rats. These studies do not support the hypothesis that magnetic field exposure promotes breast cancer in this DMBA rat model.

Abbreviations: DMBA, 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene; G, Gauss; T, Tesla

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed Email: boorman{at}niehs.nih.gov


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
J. Juutilainen
Do electromagnetic fields enhance the effects of environmental carcinogens?
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2008; 132(2): 228 - 231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
M. Fedrowitz and W. Loscher
Exposure of Fischer 344 rats to a weak power frequency magnetic field facilitates mammary tumorigenesis in the DMBA model of breast cancer
Carcinogenesis, January 1, 2008; 29(1): 186 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. Fedrowitz, K. Kamino, and W. Loscher
Significant Differences in the Effects of Magnetic Field Exposure on 7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene-Induced Mammary Carcinogenesis in Two Substrains of Sprague-Dawley Rats
Cancer Res., January 1, 2004; 64(1): 243 - 251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. Fedrowitz, J. Westermann, and W. Loscher
Magnetic Field Exposure Increases Cell Proliferation but Does Not Affect Melatonin Levels in the Mammary Gland of Female Sprague Dawley Rats
Cancer Res., March 1, 2002; 62(5): 1356 - 1363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
R. M. Ansari and T. K. Hei
Effects of 60 Hz extremely low frequency magnetic fields (EMF) on radiation- and chemical-induced mutagenesis in mammalian cells
Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2000; 21(6): 1221 - 1226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.