Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (38)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boocock, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Park, B.K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boocock, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Park, B.K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol. 21, No. 10, 1851-1858, October 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press


Carcinogenesis

Major inter-species differences in the rates of O-sulphonation and O-glucuronylation of {alpha}-hydroxytamoxifen in vitro: a metabolic disparity protecting human liver from the formation of tamoxifen–DNA adducts

David J. Boocock1, James L. Maggs1, Karen Brown2,3, Ian N.H. White2 and B.Kevin Park1,4

1 Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX and
2 MRC Toxicology Unit, Hodgkin Building, Lancaster Road, Leicester LE1 9HN, UK

Tamoxifen is a hepatic genotoxin in rats and mice but a hepatocarcinogen only in rats. It is not associated with DNA adducts and liver tumours in patients. The proposed major pathway for its bioactivation in rats involves {alpha}-hydroxylation, O-sulphonation and generation of a carbocation that reacts with DNA. Rat liver microsomes catalyse {alpha}-hydroxylation at ~2- and 4-fold the rate achieved by human and murine liver microsomes, respectively. O-glucuronylation will deactivate {alpha}-hydroxytamoxifen and compete with sulphonation. Rates of O-sulphonation of {alpha}-hydroxytamoxifen in hepatic cytosol have been determined by a HPLC assay of substrate-dependent 3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphate production. The rank order of O-glucuronylation in hepatic microsomes was estimated by HPLC–mass spectrometry. The rate of sulphonation of trans-{alpha}-hydroxytamoxifen (25 µM) in cytosol from adult female Sprague–Dawley rats and CD1 mice was 5.3 ± 0.8 and 3.9 ± 0.5 pmol/min/mg protein (mean ± SD, n = 3), respectively. In cytosol fractions from women aged 40–65 years, the rate was 1.1 ± 0.4 pmol/min/mg protein (mean ± SD, n = 6). The Km for trans-{alpha}-hydroxytamoxifen in rat, mouse and human cytosol was 84.6 ± 3.8, 81.4 ± 4.6 and 104.3 ± 5.6 µM (mean ± SD, n = 3), respectively; the corresponding Vmax values were 22.4 ± 3.4, 17.1 ± 3.1 and 6.3 ± 1.9 pmol/min/mg protein. These Km were similar to a value obtained by others using purified rat liver hydroxysteroid sulphotransferase a. Turnover of the cis epimer was too slow for accurate determination of rates. Sulphonation of trans-{alpha}-hydroxytamoxifen in human uterine cytosol was undetectable. The rank order of O-glucuronylation of trans-{alpha}-hydroxy- tamoxifen in liver microsomes was human > > mouse > rat. In combination, lower rates of {alpha}-hydroxylation and O-sulphonation and a higher rate of O-glucuronylation in human liver would protect patients from the formation of tamoxifen–DNA adducts.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
K. Brown
Is tamoxifen a genotoxic carcinogen in women?
Mutagenesis, September 1, 2009; 24(5): 391 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
D. P. Williams, D. J. Antoine, P. J. Butler, R. Jones, L. Randle, A. Payne, M. Howard, I. Gardner, J. Blagg, and B. K. Park
The Metabolism and Toxicity of Furosemide in the Wistar Rat and CD-1 Mouse: a Chemical and Biochemical Definition of the Toxicophore
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2007; 322(3): 1208 - 1220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. Brown, E. M. Tompkins, D. J. Boocock, E. A. Martin, P. B. Farmer, K. W. Turteltaub, E. Ubick, D. Hemingway, E. Horner-Glister, and I. N.H. White
Tamoxifen Forms DNA Adducts in Human Colon after Administration of a Single [14C]-Labeled Therapeutic Dose
Cancer Res., July 15, 2007; 67(14): 6995 - 7002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
D. H. Phillips, A. Hewer, M. R. Osborne, K. J. Cole, C. Churchill, and V. M. Arlt
Organ specificity of DNA adduct formation by tamoxifen and {alpha}-hydroxytamoxifen in the rat: implications for understanding the mechanism(s) of tamoxifen carcinogenicity and for human risk assessment
Mutagenesis, July 1, 2005; 20(4): 297 - 303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
L. J. Schild, D. H. Phillips, M. R. Osborne, A. Hewer, F. A. Beland, M. I. Churchwell, K. Brown, M. Gaskell, E. Wright, and M. C. Poirier
Hepatic DNA adduct dosimetry in rats fed tamoxifen: a comparison of methods
Mutagenesis, March 1, 2005; 20(2): 115 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
T. I. Apak and M. W. Duffel
INTERACTIONS OF THE STEREOISOMERS OF {alpha}-HYDROXYTAMOXIFEN WITH HUMAN HYDROXYSTEROID SULFOTRANSFERASE SULT2A1 AND RAT HYDROXYSTEROID SULFOTRANSFERASE STA
Drug Metab. Dispos., December 1, 2004; 32(12): 1501 - 1508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
S. Maiti and G. Chen
Tamoxifen Induction of Aryl Sulfotransferase and Hydroxysteroid Sulfotransferase in Male and Female Rat Liver and Intestine
Drug Metab. Dispos., May 1, 2003; 31(5): 637 - 644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
D. J. Boocock, K. Brown, A. H. Gibbs, E. Sanchez, K. W. Turteltaub, and I. N.H. White
Identification of human CYP forms involved in the activation of tamoxifen and irreversible binding to DNA
Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2002; 23(11): 1897 - 1902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
C. A. Strott
Sulfonation and Molecular Action
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2002; 23(5): 703 - 732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
T. Kasahara, M. Hashiba, T. Harada, and M. Degawa
Change in the gene expression of hepatic tamoxifen-metabolizing enzymes during the process of tamoxifen-induced hepatocarcinogenesis in female rats
Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2002; 23(3): 491 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. R. Ireson, D. J. L. Jones, S. Orr, M. W. H. Coughtrie, D. J. Boocock, M. L. Williams, P. B. Farmer, W. P. Steward, and A. J. Gescher
Metabolism of the Cancer Chemopreventive Agent Curcumin in Human and Rat Intestine
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2002; 11(1): 105 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
D. H. Phillips
Understanding the genotoxicity of tamoxifen?
Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2001; 22(6): 839 - 849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
R. Elsby, J. L. Maggs, J. Ashby, and B. K. Park
Comparison of the Modulatory Effects of Human and Rat Liver Microsomal Metabolism on the Estrogenicity of Bisphenol A: Implications for Extrapolation to Humans
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2001; 297(1): 103 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.