Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burnett, T.
Right arrow Articles by Cooney, R. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burnett, T.
Right arrow Articles by Cooney, R. V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol. 21, No. 11, 1989-1995, November 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press


Carcinogenesis

The role of nitric oxide in neoplastic transformation of C3H 10T1/2 embryonic fibroblasts

Terrilea Burnett, Ao Pung, John S. Bertram and Robert V. Cooney1

University of Hawaii Cancer Research Center, 1236 Lauhala Street, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA

Nitric oxide synthase inhibitors block the neoplastic transformation of C3H 10T1/2 cells in vitro. Evidence presented herein suggests that they mediate their effects early in the carcinogenic process as brief treatment with the NOS inhibitor aminoguanidine (AG) during log phase cell growth (initiation phase) is sufficient to block foci formation. In contrast, treatment initiated after formation of a confluent monolayer was associated with diminished protection, while treatment commencing late in the promotional phase had no protective effect and appeared to enhance the number and stage of foci observed. These findings suggest that while AG treatment can inhibit transformation during the early promotional phase, it most effectively inhibits transformation during the initiation phase. In general AG enhanced growth of both normal and tumor cells, suggesting that effects on growth were unrelated to its anti-transformation properties, however, these effects could be related to the effect on tumor cell stage noted above. Although induction of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) by treatment with LI during the last 2 weeks of the assay was associated with enhanced transformation, the efficacy of AG in protecting against transformation was not clearly associated with substantial reductions in NO synthesis. The data suggest that AG inhibits transformation early in the transformation process independently of iNOS inhibition and that AG may have deleterious effects late in the process, possibly through stimulation of tumor cell growth.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.