Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (31)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arlt, V. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schmeiser, H. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arlt, V. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schmeiser, H. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol. 21, No. 2, 235-242, February 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press


Carcinogenesis

Using polymerase arrest to detect DNA binding specificity of aristolochic acid in the mouse H-ras gene

Volker M. Arlt, Manfred Wiessler and Heinz H. Schmeiser1

Division of Molecular Toxicology, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany

The distribution of DNA adducts formed by the two main components, aristolochic acid I (AAI) and aristolochic acid II (AAII), of the carcinogenic plant extract aristolochic acid (AA) was examined in a plasmid containing exon 2 of the mouse c-H-ras gene by a polymerase arrest assay. AAI and AAII were reacted with plasmid DNA by reductive activation and the resulting DNA adducts were identified as the previously characterized adenine adducts (dA–AAI and dA–AAII) and guanine adducts (dG–AAI and dG–AAII) by the 32P-post-labeling method. In addition, a structurally unknown adduct was detected in AAII-modified DNA and shown to be derived from reaction with cytosine (dC–AAII). Sites at which DNA polymerase progress along the template was blocked were assumed to be at the nucleotide 3' to the adduct. Polymerase arrest spectra showed a preference for reaction with purine bases in the mouse H-ras gene for both activated compounds, consistent with previous results that purine adducts are the principal reaction products of AAI and AAII with DNA. Despite the structural similarities among AAI–DNA and AAII–DNA adducts, however, the polymerase arrest spectra produced by the AAs were different. According to the 32P-post-labeling analyses reductively activated AAI showed a strong preference for reacting with guanine residues in plasmid DNA, however, the polymerase arrest assay revealed arrest sites preferentially at adenine residues. In contrast, activated AAII reacted preferentially with adenine rather than guanine residues and to a lesser extent with cytosine but DNA polymerase was arrested at guanine as well as adenine and cytosine residues with nearly the same average relative intensity. Thus, the polymerase arrest spectra obtained with the AA-adducted ras sequence do not reflect the DNA adduct distribution in plasmid DNA as determined by 32P-post-labeling. Arrest sites of DNA polymerase associated with cytosine residues confirmed the presence of a cytosine adduct in DNA modified by AAII. For both compounds adduct distribution was not random; instead, regions with adduct hot spots and cold spots were observed. Results from nearest neighbor binding analysis indicated that flanking pyrimidines displayed the greatest effect on polymerase arrest and therefore on DNA binding by AA.

Abbreviations: AA, aristolochic acid; AAI, aristolochic acid I (8-methoxy-6-nitrophen-anthro[3,4-d]-1,3-dioxolo-5-carboxylic acid); AAII, aristolochic acid II (6-nitrophen-anthro[3,4-d]-1,3-dioxolo-5-carboxylic acid); dA–AAI, 7-(deoxyadenosin-N6-yl)aristolactam I; dA–AAII, 7-(deoxyadenosin-N6-yl)aristolactam II; dG–AAI, 7-(deoxyguanosin-N2-yl)aristolactam I; dG–AAII, 7-(deoxyguanosin-N2-yl)aristolactam II.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
H. L. Greetham, S. A. Bingham, and P. A. Burns
Adduction of Human p53 Gene by Fecal Water: An In vitro Biomarker of Mutagenesis in the Human Large Bowel
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2007; 16(12): 2681 - 2685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
V. M. Arlt, M. Stiborova, J. vom Brocke, M. L. Simoes, G. M. Lord, J. L. Nortier, M. Hollstein, D. H. Phillips, and H. H. Schmeiser
Aristolochic acid mutagenesis: molecular clues to the aetiology of Balkan endemic nephropathy-associated urothelial cancer
Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2007; 28(11): 2253 - 2261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
V. M. Arlt
3-Nitrobenzanthrone, a potential human cancer hazard in diesel exhaust and urban air pollution: a review of the evidence
Mutagenesis, November 1, 2005; 20(6): 399 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
M. Stiborova, E. Frei, B. Sopko, K. Sopkova, V. Markova, M. Lankova, T. Kumstyrova, M. Wiessler, and H. H. Schmeiser
Human cytosolic enzymes involved in the metabolic activation of carcinogenic aristolochic acid: evidence for reductive activation by human NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase
Carcinogenesis, October 1, 2003; 24(10): 1695 - 1703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
V. M. Arlt, M. Stiborova, and H. H. Schmeiser
Aristolochic acid as a probable human cancer hazard in herbal remedies: a review
Mutagenesis, July 1, 2002; 17(4): 265 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
V. M. Arlt, H. H. Schmeiser, and G. P. Pfeifer
Sequence-specific detection of aristolochic acid-DNA adducts in the human p53 gene by terminal transferase-dependent PCR
Carcinogenesis, January 1, 2001; 22(1): 133 - 140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.