Carcinogenesis, Vol. 21, No. 4, 845-847,
April 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press
Short Communications |
Lack of evidence for tamoxifen and toremifeneDNA adducts in lymphocytes of treated patients
Division of Toxicology and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany,
1 Institute of Cancer Research, Haddow Laboratories, Sutton, Surrey, UK and
2 Frauenklinik, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität, Heidelberg, Germany
Tamoxifen (TAM) is used for the adjuvant treatment of women with breast cancer and has also been recommended as a chemopreventive agent. Among unwanted side effects, TAM was shown to increase endometrial cancer in treated women by mechanisms that are not yet clearly understood. We studied DNA adducts in lymphocytes of female breast cancer patients treated with TAM or toremifene (TOR), a TAM analogue and compared them with adducts formed by TAM in rat liver, where the drug induces tumours. DNA adducts were measured by TLC-32P-post-labelling assays. After TLC, all DNA samples including DNA from untreated healthy women showed a faint radioactive zone, where the positive control DNA adducts isolated from the liver of rats treated with TAM migrated. The relative adduct levels were calculated from the radioactivity present in this zone. Means ± SD of adduct levels per 108 nucleotides (associated with this area) were for untreated volunteers (control) 1.83 ± 1.41 (n = 13), for TAM treatment 2.17 ± 3.04 (n = 25) and for TOR treatment 1.18 ± 1.05 (n = 8). Most of the human samples were further analysed by HPLC after labelling with 32P in order to compare adducts in human DNA with those in liver DNA isolated from TAM-treated rats. None of the human samples showed any peaks at retention times where putative TAMDNA adducts were eluted. In conclusion, lymphocyte DNA from female patients treated at therapeutic levels did not show evidence of the formation of TAM or TORDNA adducts.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Brown Is tamoxifen a genotoxic carcinogen in women? Mutagenesis, September 1, 2009; 24(5): 391 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Schild, R. L. Divi, F. A. Beland, M. I. Churchwell, D. R. Doerge, G. Gamboa da Costa, M. M. Marques, and M. C. Poirier Formation of Tamoxifen-DNA Adducts in Multiple Organs of Adult Female Cynomolgus Monkeys Dosed with Tamoxifen for 30 Days Cancer Res., September 15, 2003; 63(18): 5999 - 6003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Poirier and L. J. Schild The Genotoxicity of Tamoxifen: Extent and Consequences, Kona, Hawaii, January 23, 2003 Mutagenesis, July 1, 2003; 18(4): 395 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. Phillips Understanding the genotoxicity of tamoxifen? Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2001; 22(6): 839 - 849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Boocock, J. L. Maggs, K. Brown, I. N.H. White, and B.K. Park Major inter-species differences in the rates of O-sulphonation and O-glucuronylation of {alpha}-hydroxytamoxifen in vitro: a metabolic disparity protecting human liver from the formation of tamoxifen-DNA adducts Carcinogenesis, October 1, 2000; 21(10): 1851 - 1858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


