Carcinogenesis, Vol. 22, No. 11, 1853-1862,
November 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press
CARCINOGENESIS |
The little mutation suppresses DEN-induced hepatocarcinogenesis in mice and abrogates genetic and hormonal modulation of susceptibility
McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin Medical School, 1400 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706, USA
In mice, the sex difference in susceptibility to hepatocarcinogenesis results from the tumor promoting activity of testosterone and from the inhibition of tumor promotion by ovarian hormones. We investigated the role of growth hormone in the sex-dependent regulation of susceptibility, because sex hormones are known to regulate the temporal pattern of growth hormone secretion and subsequent sex differences in liver gene expression. We found that in both males and females, wild-type mice developed significantly more tumors than growth hormone-deficient, C57BL/6J-lit/lit (B6-lit/lit) mutant mice following perinatal treatment with the carcinogen N,N-diethylnitrosamine (DEN). B6 wild-type males developed 3659-fold more liver tumors per animal than age matched B6-lit/lit males and wild-type females developed 11-fold more tumors than B6-lit/lit females. We bred the little mutation onto the more susceptible C57BR/cdJ (BR) and C3H/HeJ (C3H) strains to assess the effect of growth hormone deficiency on hepatocarcinogenesis on additional genetic backgrounds. Growth hormone deficiency suppressed liver tumor development to <1% in males of each strain and in BR strain females. In B6 and C3H females, growth hormone deficiency caused 24-fold reductions in the volume fraction of the liver occupied by preneoplastic lesions. Furthermore, in contrast to wild-type strains, neither gonadectomy nor strain background significantly affected susceptibility in lit/lit mice, as mean liver tumor multiplicities ranged from 0 to 0.24 ± 0.44 and the volume fraction of preneoplastic lesions ranged from 0.21 ± 0.22 to 0.61 ± 1.9%. These results demonstrate that both strain and sex hormonal effects on susceptibility to liver carcinogenesis are dependent on wild-type levels of growth hormone.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. R. De Miglio, P. Virdis, D. F. Calvisi, M. Frau, M. R. Muroni, M. M. Simile, L. Daino, G. M. Careddu, E. Sanna-Passino, R. M. Pascale, et al. Mapping a Sex Hormone-Sensitive Gene Determining Female Resistance to Liver Carcinogenesis in a Congenic F344.BN-Hcs4 Rat Cancer Res., November 1, 2006; 66(21): 10384 - 10390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Corton and H. M. Brown-Borg Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Coactivator 1 in Caloric Restriction and Other Models of Longevity J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., December 1, 2005; 60(12): 1494 - 1509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K Iida, C J Rosen, C Ackert-Bicknell, and M O Thorner Genetic differences in the IGF-I gene among inbred strains of mice with different serum IGF-I levels J. Endocrinol., September 1, 2005; 186(3): 481 - 489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Stauber, H. Brown-Borg, J. Liu, M. P. Waalkes, A. Laughter, R. A. Staben, J. C. Coley, C. Swanson, K. A. Voss, J. J. Kopchick, et al. Constitutive Expression of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {alpha}-Regulated Genes in Dwarf Mice Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2005; 67(3): 681 - 694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Corton, U. Apte, S. P. Anderson, P. Limaye, L. Yoon, J. Latendresse, C. Dunn, J. I. Everitt, K. A. Voss, C. Swanson, et al. Mimetics of Caloric Restriction Include Agonists of Lipid-activated Nuclear Receptors J. Biol. Chem., October 29, 2004; 279(44): 46204 - 46212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bilger, L. M. Bennett, R. A. Carabeo, T. A. Chiaverotti, C. Dvorak, K. M. Liss, S. A. Schadewald, H. C. Pitot, and N. R. Drinkwater A Potent Modifier of Liver Cancer Risk on Distal Mouse Chromosome 1: Linkage Analysis and Characterization of Congenic Lines Genetics, June 1, 2004; 167(2): 859 - 866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





