Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (32)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cappelli, E.
Right arrow Articles by Frosina, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cappelli, E.
Right arrow Articles by Frosina, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol. 22, No. 3, 387-393, March 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press


CANCER BIOLOGY

Rates of base excision repair are not solely dependent on levels of initiating enzymes

Enrico Cappelli, Tapas Hazra1, Jeff W. Hill1, Geir Slupphaug2, Massimo Bogliolo and Guido Frosina3

DNA Repair Unit, Mutagenesis Laboratory, Istituto Nazionale Ricerca Cancro, Largo Rosanna Benzi n. 10, 16132 Genova, Italy,
1 Sealy Center for Molecular Science and Department of Human Biological Chemistry and Genetics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA and
2 Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Biology, The Medical Department, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7489 Trondheim, Norway

The oxidized base 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-oxoG), the product of deamination of cytosine uracil (U), and the sites of base loss [abasic (AP) sites] are among the most frequent mutagenic lesions formed in the human genome under physiological conditions. In human cells, the enzymatic activities initiating DNA base excision repair (BER) of 8-oxoG, U and AP sites are the 8-oxoG DNA glycosylase (hOGG1), the U-DNA glycosylase (UNG) and the major hydrolytic AP endonuclease (APE/HAP1), respectively. In recent work, we observed that BER of the three lesions occurs in human cell extracts with different efficacy. In particular, 8-oxoG is repaired on average 4-fold less efficiently than U, which, in turn, is repaired 7-fold slower than the natural AP site. To discriminate whether the different rates of repair may be linked to different expression of the initiating enzymes, we have determined the amount of hOGG1, UNG and APE/HAP1 in normal human cell extracts by immunodetection techniques. Our results show that a single human fibroblast contains 123 000 ± 22 000 hOGG1 molecules, 178 000 ± 20 000 UNG molecules and 297 000 ± 50 000 APE/HAP1 molecules. These limited differences in enzyme expression levels cannot readily explain the different rates at which the three lesions are repaired in vitro. Addition to reaction mixtures of titrated amounts of purified hOGG1, UNG and APE/HAP1 variably stimulated the in vitro repair replication of 8-oxoG, U and the AP site respectively and the increase was not always proportional to the amount of added enzyme. We conclude that the rates of BER depend only in part on cellular levels of initiating enzymes.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
S. G. Kozmin, Y. Sedletska, A. Reynaud-Angelin, D. Gasparutto, and E. Sage
The formation of double-strand breaks at multiply damaged sites is driven by the kinetics of excision/incision at base damage in eukaryotic cells
Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2009; 37(6): 1767 - 1777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
G. Eot-Houllier, M. Gonera, D. Gasparutto, C. Giustranti, and E. Sage
Interplay between DNA N-glycosylases/AP lyases at multiply damaged sites and biological consequences
Nucleic Acids Res., May 11, 2007; 35(10): 3355 - 3366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
B. A. Sokhansanj and D. M. Wilson III
Estimating the effect of human base excision repair protein variants on the repair of oxidative DNA base damage.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2006; 15(5): 1000 - 1008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. C. Blainey, A. M. van Oijen, A. Banerjee, G. L. Verdine, and X. S. Xie
A base-excision DNA-repair protein finds intrahelical lesion bases by fast sliding in contact with DNA
PNAS, April 11, 2006; 103(15): 5752 - 5757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J.-S. Sung, M. S. DeMott, and B. Demple
Long-patch Base Excision DNA Repair of 2-Deoxyribonolactone Prevents the Formation of DNA-Protein Cross-links with DNA Polymerase {beta}
J. Biol. Chem., November 25, 2005; 280(47): 39095 - 39103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
J. T. Stivers
Comment on "Uracil DNA Glycosylase Activity Is Dispensable for Immunoglobulin Class Switch"
Science, December 17, 2004; 306(5704): 2042b - 2042b.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. C. Cabelof, J. J. Raffoul, J. Nakamura, D. Kapoor, H. Abdalla, and A. R. Heydari
Imbalanced Base Excision Repair in Response to Folate Deficiency Is Accelerated by Polymerase {beta} Haploinsufficiency
J. Biol. Chem., August 27, 2004; 279(35): 36504 - 36513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A.-K. Olsen, N. Duale, M. Bjoras, C. T. Larsen, R. Wiger, J. A. Holme, E. C. Seeberg, and G. Brunborg
Limited repair of 8-hydroxy-7,8-dihydroguanine residues in human testicular cells
Nucleic Acids Res., February 15, 2003; 31(4): 1351 - 1363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
G. Frosina
Counteracting spontaneous transformation via overexpression of rate-limiting DNA base excision repair enzymes
Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2001; 22(9): 1335 - 1341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.