Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (36)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kulesz-Martin, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kulesz-Martin, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol. 22, No. 6, 851-860, June 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press


COMMENTARY

p53 protein at the hub of cellular DNA damage response pathways through sequence-specific and non-sequence-specific DNA binding

Yuangang Liu and Molly Kulesz-Martin,1

Department of Dermatology and Oregon Cancer Center, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR 97201, USA

Our environment contains physical, chemical and pathological agents that challenge the integrity of our DNA. In addition to DNA repair, higher multicellular organisms have evolved multiple pathways of response to damage including programmed cell death—apoptosis. The p53 protein appears to sense multiple types of DNA damage and coordinate with multiple options for cellular response. The p53 protein activities depend upon its DNA binding. Specific p53 protein post-translational modifications are required for efficient sequence-specific binding and transcriptional activities. Non-sequence-specific DNA binding may involve a wide spectrum of p53 proteins and predominate as DNA damage is more severe or p53 protein is more highly induced. p53 protein is not strictly required for DNA damage sensing and repair. Rather, p53 protein may govern an apoptosis checkpoint through competition with DNA repair proteins for non-sequence-specific binding to exposed single-stranded regions in the DNA duplex. This model provides a framework for testing mechanisms of p53-mediated apoptosis dependent upon the p53 protein modification state, the level of p53 protein accumulation, the level of DNA damage and the capacity of the damaged cell to repair.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Integr Cancer TherHome page
P. K. Singh, R. Kumar, A. Sharma, R. Arora, R. Chawla, S. K. Jain, and R. K. Sharma
Podophyllum hexandrum Fraction (REC-2006) Shows Higher Radioprotective Efficacy in the p53-Carrying Hepatoma Cell Line: A Role of Cell Cycle Regulatory Proteins
Integr Cancer Ther, September 1, 2009; 8(3): 261 - 272.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
E. Kress, A. Rezza, J. Nadjar, J. Samarut, and M. Plateroti
The Thyroid Hormone Receptor-{alpha} (TR{alpha}) Gene Encoding TR{alpha}1 Controls Deoxyribonucleic Acid Damage-Induced Tissue Repair
Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2008; 22(1): 47 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
N. C. Casavant, M. H. Luo, K. Rosenke, T. Winegardner, A. Zurawska, and E. A. Fortunato
Potential Role for p53 in the Permissive Life Cycle of Human Cytomegalovirus.
J. Virol., September 1, 2006; 80(17): 8390 - 8401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
E. H.C. Dirksen, J. Cloos, B. J.M. Braakhuis, R. H. Brakenhoff, A. J.R. Heck, and M. Slijper
Human Lymphoblastoid Proteome Analysis Reveals a Role for the Inhibitor of Acetyltransferases Complex in DNA Double-Strand Break Response
Cancer Res., February 1, 2006; 66(3): 1473 - 1480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. W. Wright, R. L. Stouffer, and K. D. Rodland
High-Dose Estrogen and Clinical Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators Induce Growth Arrest, p21, and p53 in Primate Ovarian Surface Epithelial Cells
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2005; 90(6): 3688 - 3695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Faedo, C. E. Ford, R. Mehta, K. Blazek, and W. D. Rawlinson
Mouse Mammary Tumor-Like Virus Is Associated with p53 Nuclear Accumulation and Progesterone Receptor Positivity but not Estrogen Positivity in Human Female Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2004; 10(13): 4417 - 4419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
I. A. Vasilevskaya, T. V. Rakitina, and P. J. O'Dwyer
Geldanamycin and its 17-Allylamino-17-Demethoxy Analogue Antagonize the Action of Cisplatin in Human Colon Adenocarcinoma Cells: Differential Caspase Activation as a Basis for Interaction
Cancer Res., June 15, 2003; 63(12): 3241 - 3246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
I. H. Chowdhury, M. Radonovich, R. Mahieux, C. Pise-Masison, S. Muralidhar, and J. N. Brady
p53 facilitates degradation of human T-cell leukaemia virus type I Tax-binding protein through a proteasome-dependent pathway
J. Gen. Virol., April 1, 2003; 84(4): 897 - 906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. D. Braastad, Z. Han, and E. A. Hendrickson
Constitutive DNase I Hypersensitivity of p53-Regulated Promoters
J. Biol. Chem., February 28, 2003; 278(10): 8261 - 8268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
D. Subramanian and J. D. Griffith
Interactions between p53, hMSH2-hMSH6 and HMG I(Y) on Holliday junctions and bulged bases
Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2002; 30(11): 2427 - 2434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. R. Lakhani, M. J. van de Vijver, J. Jacquemier, T. J. Anderson, P. P. Osin, L. McGuffog, and D. F. Easton
The Pathology of Familial Breast Cancer: Predictive Value of Immunohistochemical Markers Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, HER-2, and p53 in Patients With Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2002; 20(9): 2310 - 2318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. D. Nicholls, K. G. McLure, M. A. Shields, and P. W. K. Lee
Biogenesis of p53 Involves Cotranslational Dimerization of Monomers and Posttranslational Dimerization of Dimers. IMPLICATIONS ON THE DOMINANT NEGATIVE EFFECT
J. Biol. Chem., April 5, 2002; 277(15): 12937 - 12945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cell Growth Differ.Home page
L. Shan, S. A. Rouhani, H. A. J. Schut, and E. G. Snyderwine
2-Amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP) Modulates Lactogenic Hormone-mediated Differentiation and Gene Expression in HC11 Mouse Mammary Epithelial Cells
Cell Growth Differ., December 1, 2001; 12(12): 649 - 656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. Sivaraman, O. M. Conneely, D. Medina, and B. W. O'Malley
p53 is a potential mediator of pregnancy and hormone-induced resistance to mammary carcinogenesis
PNAS, October 12, 2001; (2001) 221459098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. Sivaraman, O. M. Conneely, D. Medina, and B. W. O'Malley
p53 is a potential mediator of pregnancy and hormone-induced resistance to mammary carcinogenesis
PNAS, October 23, 2001; 98(22): 12379 - 12384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.