Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Spitz, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Spitz, M. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol. 22, No. 6, 923-928, June 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press


CARCINOGENESIS

The association of microsomal epoxide hydrolase polymorphisms and lung cancer risk in African–Americans and Mexican–Americans

Xifeng Wu51,2, Karin Gwyn3, Christopher I. Amos1, Nimisha Makan1, Waun Ki Hong4,4 and Margaret R. Spitz1

1 Department of Epidemiology,
2 Southwest Center for Occupational Health, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 1200 Herman Pressler, Houston, TX 77030, USA
3 Department of Medical Oncology and
4 Department of Thoracic/Head & Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D.Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030 and

This study evaluated the influence of genetic polymorphisms in the microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEPHX) gene on lung cancer risk in a case–control study of two different ethnic groups, Mexican–Americans and African–Americans. There were 138 lung cancer cases (60 Mexican–American and 78 African–American) and 148 controls (76 Mexican–American and 72 African–American). There was a significant difference in the distribution of the mEPHX exon 4 polymorphism between the two ethnic groups with African–Americans more likely to be heterozygous and Mexican–Americans to be wild-type. There was no significant difference between the ethnic groups for the allelic distribution of the mEPHX exon 3 polymorphism. When the exon 4 and exon 3 polymorphism distributions in cases and controls were examined by ethnicity, only the Mexican–American cases showed a substantial proportion with the exon 4 polymorphism. The exon 4 polymorphism was associated with a significantly increased risk of lung cancer only among the Mexican–American cases (adjusted OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.26, 10.42). Younger Mexican–Americans with the exon 4 polymorphism had a greater risk of lung cancer than older members of their groups (adjusted OR 7.4, 95% CI 1.36, 40.23; 1.6, 95% CI 0.33, 7.80, respectively). The exon 3 polymorphism did not appear to significantly increase the risk of lung cancer in all but one study group examined. Mexican–Americans younger than 65 years did demonstrate an elevated risk of lung cancer (adjusted OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.19, 17.56). However, no statistically significant risk was observed in the African–American study groups for both exon 3 and exon 4 polymorphisms. These findings suggest that the presence of the exon 4 and exon 3 polymorphisms of mEPHX may be associated with an increased risk of lung cancer particularly among younger Mexican–Americans in this study.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
A. G. Schwartz, G. M. Prysak, C. H. Bock, and M. L. Cote
The molecular epidemiology of lung cancer
Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2007; 28(3): 507 - 518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. G. Schwartz and J. C. Ruckdeschel
Familial Lung Cancer: Genetic Susceptibility and Relationship to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 2006; 173(1): 16 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.