Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tavassoli, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gäken, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tavassoli, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gäken, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol. 23, No. 10, 1569-1576, October 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press


CANCER BIOLOGY

Tamoxifen inhibits the growth of head and neck cancer cells and sensitizes these cells to cisplatin induced-apoptosis: role of TGF-ß1

Mahvash Tavassoli1,3, Jila Soltaninia1, Joanna Rudnicka1, Dorothy Mashanyare1, Newell Johnson1 and Joop Gäken2

1 Head and Neck Oncology Group, Department of Oral Medicine and Pathology and
2 Molecular Medicine, King’s, Guy’s and St Thomas’ School of Medicine and Dentistry, The Rayne Institute, 123 Coldharbour Lane, London SE5 9NU, UK

A number of studies have shown that tamoxifen increases the sensitivity of several types of solid tumours to cisplatin without increasing the associated side effects. The cellular mechanisms responsible for this increased sensitivity are currently unknown. In this study we have investigated whether tamoxifen alone or in combination with cisplatin could induce apoptosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines. We have shown that tamoxifen treatment resulted in G1 arrest in two cell lines, HN5 and HN6. Tamoxifen induced growth suppression was independent of p53 status but resulted in up-regulation of cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKIs) p21/Waf-1, p27/Kip1 and p15/INK4a. Furthermore, tamoxifen treatment resulted in an increased level of hypophosphorylated active RB. Cisplatin induced p53 independent apoptosis in both head and neck cancer cell lines. There was a significant sensitizing effect of tamoxifen on cisplatin-induced apoptosis in HN5 and HN6 cells, with the combined treatment being more effective in inducing apoptosis. Addition of tamoxifen did not result in significant inhibition of PKC activity in HN5 and HN6 cells. However, tamoxifen treatment resulted in increased secretion of TGF-ß1 by HN5 and HN6 cells. An anti-TGF-ß blocking antibody prevented both the blockade of cellular proliferation and the increased expression of CDKIs associated with tamoxifen treatment of HN5 and HN6 cells. These results show that tamoxifen alone induces a transient G1 arrest that greatly sensitizes the cells to apoptosis induced by cisplatin. We have shown that the mechanism for this p53-independent G1 arrest and apoptosis is at least partly due to the activation of TGF-ß1 resulting in the induction of p15/INK4b, p27/Kip-1, p21/Waf-1 and RB hypophosphorylation. These in vitro results suggest that combination of tamoxifen and cisplatin might be a more effective treatment for head and neck cancers than single modality therapy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
T. K S Ku and D. L Crowe
Coactivator-mediated estrogen response in human squamous cell carcinoma lines
J. Endocrinol., April 1, 2007; 193(1): 147 - 155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
I. Mercier, S. Mader, and A. Calderone
Tamoxifen and ICI 182,780 negatively influenced cardiac cell growth via an estrogen receptor-independent mechanism
Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 2003; 59(4): 883 - 892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.