Carcinogenesis, Vol. 23, No. 6, 1003-1008,
June 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press
MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CANCER PREVENTION |
Genetic polymorphisms of DNA repair and xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes: role in mutagen sensitivity
1 Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Toxicology, Department of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, FIN-00250 Helsinki, Finland and
2 National Institute of Oncology, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary
Mutagen sensitivity, measuring the extent of chromosome damage induced by an in vitro treatment of peripheral lymphocytes with bleomycin, has been associated with an increased risk of various human cancers. Sensitivity to bleomycin appears to have high heritability and is usually considered to reflect individual capacity to repair DNA lesions. Another potential contributor to variation in bleomycin sensitivity could be inherited differences in the metabolism of bleomycin. We assessed whether genetic polymorphisms of DNA repair and xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes (XMEs) could explain bleomycin sensitivity. Frequencies of bleomycin-induced chromatid breaks per cell (b/c) were determined for 80 healthy Caucasians. Genotypes of DNA repair genes XRCC (X-ray repair cross-complementing) 1 and 3 and XME genes bleomycin hydrolase (BLHX), glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) and T1 (GSTT1) and N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) were analyzed from leukocyte DNA using methods based on polymerase chain reaction. The mean number of chromatid b/c was increased in individuals with XRCC1 codon 280 variant allele (P = 0.002; two-sided MannWhitney test). Smokers carrying BLHX codon 1450 variant allele showed a decrease in the mean number of chromatid b/c (P = 0.036). In multiple linear regression models including adjustment for age, sex, smoking and genotype, the adjusted relative risks (and 95% confidence intervals) were 1.18 (0.981.41) and 0.84 (0.691.00) for carriers of XRCC1 codon 280 and BLHX codon 1450 variant alleles, respectively. XRCC1 codon 280 polymorphism had a significant effect (P = 0.012) in predetermining whether the individual was classified as non-sensitive, sensitive or hypersensitive to bleomycin. Although based on relatively few individuals, our results suggest that bleomycin sensitivity is partially explained by genetic polymorphisms affecting DNA repair (XRCC1) and in vitro metabolism of bleomycin (BLHX).
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. C. de Haas, N. Zwart, C. Meijer, J. Nuver, H. M. Boezen, A. J.H. Suurmeijer, H. J. Hoekstra, G. van der Steege, D. Th. Sleijfer, and J. A. Gietema Variation in Bleomycin Hydrolase Gene Is Associated With Reduced Survival After Chemotherapy for Testicular Germ Cell Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., April 10, 2008; 26(11): 1817 - 1823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Mateuca, M. Roelants, G. Iarmarcovai, P. V. Aka, L. Godderis, A. Tremp, S. Bonassi, M. Fenech, J.-L. Berge-Lefranc, and M. Kirsch-Volders hOGG1326, XRCC1399 and XRCC3241 polymorphisms influence micronucleus frequencies in human lymphocytes in vivo Mutagenesis, January 1, 2008; 23(1): 35 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-Y. Huang, Y.-T. Gao, A. Rashid, L. C. Sakoda, J. Deng, M.-C. Shen, B.-S. Wang, T.-Q. Han, B.-H. Zhang, B. E. Chen, et al. Selected base excision repair gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to biliary tract cancer and biliary stones: a population-based case-control study in China Carcinogenesis, January 1, 2008; 29(1): 100 - 105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. I. Berndt, W.-Y. Huang, M. D. Fallin, K. J. Helzlsouer, E. A. Platz, J. L. Weissfeld, T. R. Church, R. Welch, S. J. Chanock, and R. B. Hayes Genetic Variation in Base Excision Repair Genes and the Prevalence of Advanced Colorectal Adenoma Cancer Res., February 1, 2007; 67(3): 1395 - 1404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. F. Pachkowski, S. Winkel, Y. Kubota, J. A. Swenberg, R. C. Millikan, and J. Nakamura XRCC1 Genotype and Breast Cancer: Functional Studies and Epidemiologic Data Show Interactions between XRCC1 Codon 280 His and Smoking. Cancer Res., March 1, 2006; 66(5): 2860 - 2868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Hung, J. Hall, P. Brennan, and P. Boffetta Genetic Polymorphisms in the Base Excision Repair Pathway and Cancer Risk: A HuGE Review Am. J. Epidemiol., November 15, 2005; 162(10): 925 - 942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Zhang, J. Wan, X. Jin, T. Jin, H. Shen, D. Lu, and Z. Xia Genetic Polymorphisms in XRCC1, APE1, ADPRT, XRCC2, and XRCC3 and Risk of Chronic Benzene Poisoning in a Chinese Occupational Population Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2005; 14(11): 2614 - 2619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Szekely, E. Remenar, M. Kasler, and S. Gundy Mutagen sensitivity of patients with cancer at different sites of the head and neck Mutagenesis, September 1, 2005; 20(5): 381 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Hung, P. Brennan, F. Canzian, N. Szeszenia-Dabrowska, D. Zaridze, J. Lissowska, P. Rudnai, E. Fabianova, D. Mates, L. Foretova, et al. Large-Scale Investigation of Base Excision Repair Genetic Polymorphisms and Lung Cancer Risk in a Multicenter Study J Natl Cancer Inst, April 20, 2005; 97(8): 567 - 576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Savas, D. Y. Kim, M. F. Ahmad, M. Shariff, and H. Ozcelik Identifying Functional Genetic Variants in DNA Repair Pathway Using Protein Conservation Analysis Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2004; 13(5): 801 - 807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Figueiredo, J. A. Knight, L. Briollais, I. L. Andrulis, and H. Ozcelik Polymorphisms XRCC1-R399Q and XRCC3-T241M and the Risk of Breast Cancer at the Ontario Site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2004; 13(4): 583 - 591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Hagmar, U. Stromberg, S. Bonassi, I.-L. Hansteen, L. E. Knudsen, C. Lindholm, and H. Norppa Impact of Types of Lymphocyte Chromosomal Aberrations on Human Cancer Risk: Results from Nordic and Italian Cohorts Cancer Res., March 15, 2004; 64(6): 2258 - 2263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Lin, X. Zhang, and Y. Chen Mutagen sensitivity as a susceptibility marker for endometriosis Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2003; 18(10): 2052 - 2057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ahsan and A. G. Rundle Measures of genotype versus gene products: promise and pitfalls in cancer prevention Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2003; 24(9): 1429 - 1434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Szekely, E. Remenar, M. Kasler, and S. Gundy Does the bleomycin sensitivity assay express cancer phenotype? Mutagenesis, January 1, 2003; 18(1): 59 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||







