Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharp, Z.D.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sharp, Z.D.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, J. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol. 24, No. 2, 179-183, February 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press


CANCER BIOLOGY

Minimal effects of dietary restriction on neuroendocrine carcinogenesis in Rb+/– mice

Z.Dave Sharp1,5, Wen-Hwa Lee1, Alexander Yu Nikitin4, Andrea Flesken-Nikitin4, Yuji Ikeno2, Robert Reddick3, Arlan G. Richardson2 and James F. Nelson2

1 Departments of Molecular Medicine,
2 Physiology, and
3 Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 15355 Lambda Drive, San Antonio, TX, and
4 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Campus Road T2 007 VRT, Ithaca, NY 14853-6401, USA

The efficacy of dietary restriction in retarding tumor growth is well established in rodents. However, gene and cell lineage specificity of dietary restriction effects is far less defined. Mice with a single copy of the retinoblastoma susceptibility gene (Rb) develop a well-established syndrome of mouse neuroendocrine neoplasia associated with Rb deficiency. Thus, if DR represses tumor growth in this model, it should be unambiguously attributed to the Rb defect in neuroendocrine cell lineages. To address this possibility, Rb+/– mice were entered into a diet restriction study. Surprisingly, 40–50% reductions in dietary intake, relative to an ad libitum group, started on either postnatal day 28 or 42 had little to no effect on either the frequency or growth of pituitary tumors either during the latency period (postnatal day 224) or at the time of their natural death. Consistent with cross-section data, survival of 65 diet restricted Rb+/– mice was almost identical to that of 67 Rb+/– mice fed ad libitum (AL); median life span was 414 and 436 days for AL and DR groups, respectively. These findings indicate that diet restriction provides no significant benefit in delaying growth and progression of neuroendocrine tumors exhibiting loss of RB function. They also introduce the possibility that RB is required for the tumor-repressive effects of DR.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Z. Zhou, A. Flesken-Nikitin, C. G. Levine, E. N. Shmidt, J. P. Eng, E. Yu. Nikitina, D. M. Spencer, and A. Yu. Nikitin
Suppression of Melanotroph Carcinogenesis Leads to Accelerated Progression of Pituitary Anterior Lobe Tumors and Medullary Thyroid Carcinomas in Rb+/- Mice
Cancer Res., February 1, 2005; 65(3): 787 - 796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
J. M. Ward and D. E. Devor-Henneman
Mouse Models of Human Familial Cancer Syndromes
Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2004; 32(1_suppl): 90 - 98.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
H. Van Remmen, Y. Ikeno, M. Hamilton, M. Pahlavani, N. Wolf, S. R. Thorpe, N. L. Alderson, J. W. Baynes, C. J. Epstein, T.-T. Huang, et al.
Life-long reduction in MnSOD activity results in increased DNA damage and higher incidence of cancer but does not accelerate aging
Physiol Genomics, December 16, 2003; 16(1): 29 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.