Skip Navigation


Carcinogenesis Advance Access originally published online on March 28, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/5/803    most recent
bgg020v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rubin, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rubin, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Carcinogenesis, Vol. 24, No. 5, 803-816, May 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press


COMMENTARY

Complementary approaches to understanding the role of proteases and their natural inhibitors in neoplastic development: retrospect and prospect

Harry Rubin

Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Life Sciences Addition, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3200, USA

Email: hrubin{at}uclink4.berkeley.edu

A great deal of evidence has accumulated in recent years for an important but complex role for proteases in tumor development. However, attempts to treat cancer in humans with anti-proteases have been disappointing, and it has been suggested that more basic groundwork is needed before anti-proteases can be effectively applied. Considerable basic information comes from the recognition that earlier results on transformation of chicken embryo fibroblasts (CEF) by the Bryan strain of Rous sarcoma virus (B-RSV) can be explained in terms of proteases and their inhibitors. In particular, the full but reversible normalization of discrete transformed foci by appropriate concentrations of fetal bovine or of calf serum implies a causal role for multiple proteases in transformation, and the efficacy of treatment with a physiological balance of their natural inhibitors. Addition of certain proteases to contact-inhibited normal cultures was then found to stimulate their proliferation. The toxicity of medium produced by CEF heavily transformed with B-RSV suggests that cachexia and other systemic effects of human cancer may result from vascular dissemination of peptides from pericellular proteolysis within tumors. Comprehensive studies revealed significant increases of plasminogen activator and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) after infection of CEF with other strains of RSV, and correlation of the proteases with aspects of transformation. A similar role for proteases is indicated in the transformation of mammalian cells by chemical and physical agents. The information gained from functional experiments on cell transformation in culture is complementary to that obtained from the molecular identification of proteases and their inhibitors in all stages of tumor development. The speed, quantification and easy manipulation of the RSV-CEF transformation assay can be combined with current methods of characterizing proteases and anti-proteases to further enrich our basic knowledge of neoplastic development in cells, and facilitate its application to the treatment of cancer.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.