Skip Navigation


Carcinogenesis Advance Access originally published online on September 28, 2006
Carcinogenesis 2007 28(3):648-656; doi:10.1093/carcin/bgl182
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/3/648    most recent
bgl182v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hemminki, K.
Right arrow Articles by Bermejo, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hemminki, K.
Right arrow Articles by Bermejo, J. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Constraints for genetic association studies imposed by attributable fraction and familial risk

Kari Hemminki1,2,* and Justo Lorenzo Bermejo1

1 Division of Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Im Neuenheimer Feld 580, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
2 Center for Family Medicine, Karolinska Institute 141 83 Huddinge, Sweden

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: k.hemminki{at}dkfz.de

Candidate gene studies have become very popular but some of their implicit constraints, such as the familial risk and the population attributable fraction (PAF) conferred by the gene under study, are poorly understood. We model here these parameters for susceptibility genes in terms of genotype relative risk (GRR), allele frequency and statistical power in simulated genetic association studies, assuming 500 or 2000 case–control pairs and different modes of inheritance. The results show that the common association studies on genes with minor allele frequency >10% have sufficient power to detect disease-causing variants conferring PAFs >10%, which can be compared to known genes, such as BRCA1 with a PAF of 1.8%. Yet, common low-risk variants confer low familial relative risks (FRRs), typically <1.1. The models show that candidate gene studies may be able to identify genes conferring close to 100% of the PAF, but they may not explain the empirical FRRs. In order to explain FRRs, rare, high-penetrant genes or interacting combinations of common variants need to be uncovered. However, the candidate gene studies for common alleles do not target this class of genes. The results may challenge the common disease–common variant hypothesis, which posits common variants with low GRRs and large PAFs, however failing to accommodate the empirical FRRs.

Abbreviations: CDCV, common disease–common variant; FRR, familialrelative risk; GRR, genotype relative risk; PAF, population attributable fractions; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.

Received July 26, 2006; revised September 13, 2006; accepted September 15, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
K. Hemminki, J. Sundquist, and J. Lorenzo Bermejo
Familial Risks for Cancer as the Basis for Evidence-Based Clinical Referral and Counseling
Oncologist, March 1, 2008; 13(3): 239 - 247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
K Hemminki, A Forsti, and J L Bermejo
Estimating risks of common complex diseases: familial and population risks
J. Med. Genet., February 1, 2008; 45(2): 126 - 127.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.