Carcinogenesis Advance Access originally published online on January 12, 2008
Carcinogenesis 2008 29(5):1083; doi:10.1093/carcin/bgm305
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Environment in cancer causation and etiological fraction: limitations and ambiguities
Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, CeRMS and CPO-Piemonte, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
2 Occupational Health Unit, Department of Prevention, Local Health Authority of Padua, Padua, Italy
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +39 011 6336966; Fax: +39 011 6336960 Email: d.mirabelli@cpo.it
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Boffetta et al. (1) discussed in depth the main "errors" that produce over-estimates in the attributable fraction of environmental cancer, because they are less widely appreciated than those producing the opposite effect. We would like to focus on the risk of mesothelioma following environmental exposures to asbestos, the first environmental carcinogen taken into account by the authors in their paper and in a previous article (2), because we think that, on the contrary, it has often been overlooked.
A
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Vineis and W. Xun The emerging epidemic of environmental cancers in developing countries Ann. Onc., February 1, 2009; 20(2): 205 - 212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
