Skip Navigation



Carcinogenesis Advance Access published online on August 17, 2006

Carcinogenesis, doi:10.1093/carcin/bgl138
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/1/143    most recent
bgl138v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, X.
Right arrow Articles by Swanson, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, X.
Right arrow Articles by Swanson, S. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received May 4, 2006
Revised July 6, 2006
Accepted July 19, 2006

CANCER PREVENTION

Inhibition of estrogen independent mammary carcinogenesis by disruption of growth hormone signaling

Xiao Zhang 1, Rajendra G. Mehta 2, Daniel D. Lantvit 1, Karen T. Coschigano 3, John J. Kopchick 3, Jeffrey E. Green 4, Samad Hedayat 5, Konstantin T. Christov 6, Vera H. Ray 7, Terry G. Unterman 8, and Steven M. Swanson 9 *

1 Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60612
2 Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60612; Illinois Institute of Technology Research Institute, Chicago, IL 60616
3 Edison Biotechnology Institute and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH
4 Laboratory of Cell Regulation and Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
5 Department of Math, Statistics, and Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60612
6 Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60612
7 Provident Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL
8 Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60612; Department of Veterans Affairs Jesse Brown Medical Center, Chicago, IL, 60612
9 Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60612; Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60612

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Steven M. Swanson, E-mail: swanson{at}uic.edu


   Abstract

Clinical trials and laboratory-based studies indicate that the growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor-I (GH/IGF) axis may affect the development of breast cancer. The purpose of the present investigation was to develop a genetic model of mammary cancer to test the hypothesis that down regulation of GH signaling can substantially retard mammary cancer progression. We crossed the Laron mouse, in which the gene for the GH receptor/binding protein (GHR/BP) has been disrupted, with the C3(1)/TAg mouse, which develops estrogen receptor negative mammary cancers. All mice used in our experiments were heterozygous for the large T antigen (TAg) and either homozygous wild type for GHR (Ghr+/+) or null for GHR (Ghr-/-). Compared with the TAg/Ghr+/+ mice, the TAg/Ghr-/- mice showed delayed mammary cancer latency with significantly decreased multiplicity (9.8 ± 1.4 vs. 3.2 ± 1.2) and volume (776.1 ± 284.4 vs. 50.5 ± 8.9 mm3). Furthermore, the frequency of mammary hyperplasias was significantly reduced in the TAg/Ghr-/- mice (15.0 ± 1.7 vs. 6.8 ± 1.7). To establish that these mammary cancers were estrogen independent, 12-week-old TAg/Ghr+/+ mice, which lack visible hyperplasia, were either ovariectomized (ovx) or sham operated (sham). Compared with the sham group, ovariectomy resulted in no difference in the frequency of mammary hyperplasia, mammary tumor latency, incidence, multiplicity or tumor size. Together, these data demonstrate that the disruption of GH signaling significantly retards TAg-driven mammary carcinogenesis, and suggest that disrupting GH signaling may be an effective strategy to inhibit the progression of estrogen independent breast cancer.

Keywords: Growth Hormone Receptor; C3(1)/TAg; mammary cancer.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. J. Waters and J. L. Barclay
Does Growth Hormone Drive Breast and Other Cancers?
Endocrinology, October 1, 2007; 148(10): 4533 - 4535.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
Q. Shen, D. D. Lantvit, Q. Lin, Y. Li, K. Christov, Z. Wang, T. G. Unterman, R. G. Mehta, and S. M. Swanson
Advanced Rat Mammary Cancers Are Growth Hormone Dependent
Endocrinology, October 1, 2007; 148(10): 4536 - 4544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.