Skip Navigation



Carcinogenesis Advance Access published online on February 2, 2007

Carcinogenesis, doi:10.1093/carcin/bgm011
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/10/2063    most recent
bgm011v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ansari, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ansari, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, S. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Prostaglandin receptor EP2 is responsible for cyclooxygenase-2 induction by prostaglandin E2 in mouse skin

Kausar M. Ansari1,2, You Me Sung1,2, Guobin He1 and Susan M. Fischer1

1 The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Science Park-Research Division, Smithville, Texas 78957, U.S.A

Correspondence should be addressed to Susan M. Fischer at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Science Park-Research Division, P.O. Box 389, Smithville, Texas 78957, U.S.A. E-mail: smfischer{at}mdanderson.org

The EP2 prostanoid receptor is a one of the four subtypes of receptors for prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). We previously reported that deletion of EP2 led to resistance to chemically-induced mouse skin carcinogenesis, whereas overexpression of EP2 resulted in enhanced tumor development. The purpose of this study was to investigate the underlying molecular mechanisms. We found that EP2 knockout mice had reduced cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression after 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) treatment compared to wild type (WT) mice. Further, primary keratinocytes from EP2 transgenic mice had increased COX-2 expression after either TPA or PGE2 treatment and COX-2 expression was blocked by 10 µM SQ 22,536, an adenylate cyclase inhibitor. EP2 knockout mice had significantly decreased whereas EP2 transgenic mice had significantly increased PGE2 production in response to a single treatment of TPA. Cyclic AMP response element binding protein (CREB) phosphorylation was elevated to a greater extent in keratinocytes from EP2 transgenic mice compared to those of WT mice following PGE2 treatment. A protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor reduced PGE2-mediated CREB phosphorylation in keratinocytes from EP2 transgenic mice. Furthermore, we found that there was no CREB phosphorylation in EP2 knockout mice following PGE2 treatment. PGE2-induced DNA synthesis (cell proliferation) was significantly decreased in keratinocytes from EP2 knockout mice following pretreatment with 10 µM SQ 22,536. Taken together, EP2 activation of the PKA/CREB signaling pathway is responsible for keratinocyte proliferation and our findings reveal a positive feedback loop between COX-2 and PGE2 that is mediated by the EP2 receptor.

Key Words: Prostaglandin E2 • EP2 receptor • CREB • COX-2 • skin carcinogennesis


2 Both of these authors contributed equally to this article

Received August 25, 2006; revised January 9, 2007; accepted January 10, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
D.-H. Kim, J.-H. Kim, E.-H. Kim, H.-K. Na, Y.-N. Cha, J. H. Chung, and Y.-J. Surh
15-Deoxy-{Delta}12,14-prostaglandin J2 upregulates the expression of heme oxygenase-1 and subsequently matrix metalloproteinase-1 in human breast cancer cells: possible roles of iron and ROS
Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2009; 30(4): 645 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.