Skip Navigation



Carcinogenesis Advance Access published online on January 23, 2009

Carcinogenesis, doi:10.1093/carcin/bgp016
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/3/487    most recent
bgp016v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

FAS promoter polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis based on 34 case-control studies

Zhizhong Zhang1,2,{dagger}, Hengchuan Xue3,{dagger}, Weida Gong4,{dagger}, Meilin Wang1,2, Lin Yuan1,2, Suping Han5 and Zhengdong Zhang1,2,*

1 Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
2 Department of Molecular & Genetic Toxicology, Cancer Center of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
3 Institute of Cancer Research, Yangzhong People's Hospital, Yangzhong 212200, China
4 Department of Surgery, Yixing People's Hospital, Yixing 214200, China
5 Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China

* Correspondence to: Zhengdong Zhang, Department of Molecular & Genetic Toxicology, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, 140 Hanzhong Road, Nanjing 210029, China. Tel: +86 25 86862937; Fax: +86 25 86527613; Email: zdzhang{at}njmu.edu.cn

FAS is a cell surface receptor involved in apoptotic signal transmission and plays important roles in the etiology of cancer. The –1377G>A and –670A>G polymorphisms of the FAS gene influence the FAS transcription and have been implicated in cancer risk. However, the results from the published studies on the association between these two FAS polymorphisms and cancer risk are conflicting. To derive a more precise estimation of association between the FAS polymorphisms and risk of cancer, we performed a meta-analysis of 11,461 cancer cases and 12,708 controls from 34 published case-control studies for these two polymorphisms. We used odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the strength of the association. Overall, individuals with the –1377AA genotype were associated with higher cancer risk than those with the –1377GG (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.08-1.36, Pheterogeneity = 0.062) or GA/GG (OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.10-1.36, Pheterogeneity = 0.060) genotypes while the –670GG genotype had no effects on overall cancer risk. In the stratified analyses for the –1377G>A polymorphism, there was a significantly increased risk of breast cancer but a significantly decreased risk of melanoma in a dominant model. Moreover, a significantly increased risk was observed among smokers in a recessive model (OR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.55-2.49; Pheterogeneity = 0.528). Although some modest bias could not be eliminated, this meta-analysis suggested that the FAS –1377A allele is a low-penetrant risk factor for cancer development, particularly among smokers.

Key Words: apoptosis • genetic variation • molecular epidemiology


{dagger} These authors contributed equally to this work.

Received November 6, 2008; revised December 30, 2008; accepted January 6, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.