Skip Navigation



Carcinogenesis Advance Access published online on June 11, 2009

Carcinogenesis, doi:10.1093/carcin/bgp126
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/8/1363    most recent
bgp126v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheung, W. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cheung, W. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Epidermal Growth Factor A61G Gene Polymorphism, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Risk

Winson Y. Cheung1,2, Rihong Zhai2, Matthew Kulke3, Rebecca Heist4, Kofi Asomaning2, Clement Ma5, Zhaoxi Wang2, Li Su2, David Christiani2 and Geoffrey Liu2,5,6

1 British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
2 Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
3 Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
4 Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
5 Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
6 University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Address Correspondences and Reprints to: Geoffrey Liu, MD, MSc, FRCP(C), Staff Medical Oncologist, Princess Margaret Hospital, Assistant Professor, University of Toronto, Room 7-125, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Tel: 416.946.3428, Fax: 416.946.6529, Email: geoffrey.liu{at}uhn.on.ca

Background: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of key cancer genes, such as EGF A61G, are associated with an elevated risk of EAC. As GERD is an established risk factor for EAC, we evaluated whether the association between EGF polymorphism and EAC development is altered by the presence of GERD.

Methods: EGF genotyping of DNA samples was performed and GERD history was collected for 309 EAC patients and 275 matched healthy controls. Associations between genotypes and EAC risk were evaluated using adjusted logistic regression. Genotype-GERD relationships were explored using analyses stratified by GERD history and joint effects models that considered severity and duration of GERD symptoms.

Results: EGF variants (A/G or G/G) were more common (p = 0.02) and GERD was more prevalent (p<0.001) in cases than in controls. When compared to the EGF wild type A/A genotype, the G/G variant was associated with a substantial increase in EAC risk among individuals with GERD (OR 9.7; 95% CI, 3.8-25.0; p<0.001) and a slight decrease in risk for GERD-free individuals (OR 0.4; 95% CI, 0.22-0.90; p=0.02). In the joint effects models, the odds of EAC was also highest for G/G patients (when compared with A/A) who either experienced frequent GERD of greater than once per week (OR 21.8; 95% CI, 5.1-94.0; p<0.001) or suffered GERD for longer than 15 years (OR 22.4; 95% CI, 6.5-77.6; p<0.001). There was a highly significant interaction between the G/G genotype and the presence of GERD (p<0.001).

Conclusions: EGF A61G polymorphism may alter EAC susceptibility through an interaction with GERD.

Key Words: Epidermal growth factor • polymorphism • gastroesophageal reflux • esophageal cancer

Received February 8, 2009; revised May 13, 2009; accepted May 14, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.